(AGENPARL) – mer 31 gennaio 2024 PRESS RELEASE No 23/24
Luxembourg, 31 January 2024
Judgment of the General Court in Case T-745/20 | Symphony Environmental Technologies and
Symphony Environmental v Parliament and Others
Products made from oxo-degradable plastic: the General Court endorses
the prohibition on the placing on the market
The European legislature did not make a manifest error when it adopted a prohibition in line with the objective
of protecting the environment and human health
In order to limit their impact on the environment, the European legislature adopted a directive 1 in 2019 prohibiting,
inter alia, the placing on the market of products made from oxo-degradable plastic 2. Symphony Environmental
Technologies and Symphony Environmental, companies established in the United Kingdom, develop, produce and
market certain specialised plastic products together with the additives used for making them.
They produce a pro-oxidant additive which, in their view, enables plastic to biodegrade more quickly than oxodegradable plastic. Those two companies seek compensation for the damage suffered in so far as the prohibition on
the placing on the market of oxo-degradable plastic applies to plastic which they classify as ‘oxo-biodegradable’.
The General Court dismisses the action.
According to the General Court, the European legislature did not make a manifest error in prohibiting the placing on
the market of products made from plastic containing a pro-oxidant additive 3. According to the scientific studies
available when the directive was adopted, the level of biodegradation of that plastic is low to non-existent in an
open environment, in landfill or in the marine environment.
In addition, plastic containing a pro-oxidant additive is not suitable for any form of composting. Lastly, recycling
such plastic is problematic since the technologies available do not allow reprocessors to identify plastic containing a
pro-oxidant additive and to sort it from conventional plastic.
The General Court also observes that the prohibition on placing on the market of products made from plastic
containing a pro-oxidant additive does not infringe the principle of proportionality. That prohibition is in line with
the 2019 directive’s objective of protecting the environment and human health.
Finally, the prohibition in question does not infringe the principle of equal treatment, since products made from
plastic containing a pro-oxidant additive are not in a situation comparable with products made from conventional
plastic. The more rapid fragmentation of plastic containing a pro-oxidant additive can have an increased negative
impact on the environment since its biodegradation is concentrated over a shorter period. Furthermore, products
made from plastic containing a pro-oxidant additive and those made from compostable plastic are not in a
comparable situation.
Communications Directorate
Press and Information Unit
curia.europa.eu
NOTE: An action for annulment seeks the annulment of acts of the institutions of the European Union that are
contrary to European Union law. The Member States, the European institutions and individuals may, under certain
conditions, bring an action for annulment before the Court of Justice or the General Court. If the action is well
founded, the act is annulled. The institution concerned must fill any legal vacuum created by the annulment of the
NOTE: An appeal, limited to points of law only, may be brought before the Court of Justice against the decision of
the General Court within two months and ten days of notification of the decision.
Unofficial document for media use, not binding on the General Court.
The full text and, as the case may be, the abstract of the judgment is published on the CURIA website on the day of
delivery.
Stay Connected!
Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on
the environment.
That directive defines oxo-degradable plastic as a plastic to which one or more additives have been added which, through oxidation, lead to its
fragmentation into micro-fragments or to it undergoing chemical decomposition.
Since the parties use various terms for plastic to which a pro-oxidant additive has been added, the General Court has chosen to use the most
neutral term possible, namely ‘plastic containing a pro-oxidant additive’.
Communications Directorate
Trending
- City Minute — Headlines from May 14-15
- Your IMF Update: Country Report No. 2024/127 – St. Kitts and Nevis
- Your IMF Update: Country Report No. 2024/126 – St. Kitts and Nevis
- Memorial Day SAP: Violenza negli stadi e nelle piazze, costruiamo un futuro migliore
- #meteo #maltempo: la situazione a Monza alle ore 22.00
- Salute, Neurofibromatosi di tipo 1 (NF1): Presentata oggi a Roma la campagna “Siamo iNFinite sfumature” per promuovere il valore dell’inclusione
- Catania, al Four Points Sheraton convegno sulla medicina di genere
- Maltempo, il Sottosegretario al Ministero dell’Interno Prisco segue l’emergenza in Lombardia: “Oltre 400 interventi, rafforzato il personale, in arrivo moduli per rischio acquatico”
- Comunicato Stampa 776/2024 MALTEMPO IN VENETO. PRESIDENTE: “FIUMI SOTTO MONITORAGGIO, APERTI SERVIZI DI PIENA A VICENZA E PADOVA”
- Manitoba Media Bulletin: Fire Bulletin #7