
There are ancient principles that every Freemason should strictly follow, especially those handed down by overseas Lodges and compiled in 1723 for the use of the Lodges of London. Among these, we read that Freemasonry “encourages tolerance, practices justice, helps those in need, promotes love for others” and, believe it or not, seeks everything that unites men and nations to better contribute to the realization of universal brotherhood.
And then, a rather significant detail: a Freemason is bound to scrupulously respect the Constitutional Charter of the State in which he resides. Yes, because integrity, ethics, and respect for the rules are fundamental values.
Now, keeping this noble principle in mind, one naturally wonders: why, then, has the Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy, Stefano Bisi, not followed this sacred precept in his own house?
The Grand Master and the strange admission of irregularities
In Decree No. 506/SB, Stefano Bisi officially admitted that the previous elections—called by none other than himself with Decree No. 451/SB—were tainted by irregularities. And not minor, negligible mistakes, but flaws so serious that they required their revocation and annulment. All this, it is stated, to ensure the “correct expression of the vote and maximum participation.”
An example of transparency? Perhaps. Or rather, a surprising demonstration of how to wave the flag of honesty without facing any real consequences. Because if there were indeed irregularities, one must ask:
- Why were no concrete measures taken?
- Why has no one been held accountable in the appropriate venues?
- Why was the whole issue resolved with a simple annulment, without determining responsibility?
In short, if there was a problem, who caused it? And why is no one paying the price?
The Central Court: The body that (perhaps) will never prosecute anyone
And here we come to the most interesting part. According to Articles 67 and 68 of the GOI Regulations, the Central Court has the authority to judge Masonic offenses of the highest level. There is even a provision for a trial for high treason and/or an attack on the Constitution.
Fantastic! Now that there is a decree officially confirming electoral irregularities, will someone call upon the Central Court to seek clarity?
No, don’t worry. None of that will happen.
Because, as it turns out, if the irregularities are certified by the Grand Master himself, it is no longer high treason but simply a “need to repeat the elections.” And what about the Tavole d’Accusa (charges)? They are inadmissible unless based on the reasons stated in the first paragraph. A convenient shield to avoid uncomfortable internal trials.
Was Agenparl right? Oh yes, if only we had known sooner…
At this point, how can we not recall the case of the lost stickers reported by Agenparl? Do you remember the tragicomic incident of the National Electoral Commission, which allegedly annulled hundreds of votes over a forgotten adhesive label?
When it comes to technicalities, the Masonic justice system seems to work flawlessly. But when the Grand Master himself admits that irregularities have occurred, everything is resolved with a new decree and a polite farewell.
What can we say? A round of applause for the sincerity, but a bitter laugh for the total lack of consequences.
At this point, Agenparl was right.
Oh yes, if only we had known sooner…