(AGENPARL) – ven 14 febbraio 2025 Zootaxa 5583 (2): 371–382
https://www.mapress.com/zt/
Copyright © 2025 Magnolia Press
Article
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
ZOOTAXA
ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)
Revisiting the genus Diplodoma Zeller, 1852 in Europe: DNA barcoding reveals
the presence of an undescribed species from forested habitats of southern Italy
(Lepidoptera: Psychidae)
SARA LA CAVA1,2,*, GIUSEPPE RIJLLO1,2,3, GIADA ZUCCO1,4 & STEFANO SCALERCIO1,2,5
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, Rende (Cosenza), 87036, Italy
NBFC, National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, 90133, Italy
Abstract
Diplodoma Zeller, 1852 is a Eurasian genus belonging to the family Psychidae Boisduval, 1829 of which three species are
known in Europe: Diplodoma adspersella Heinmann, 1870, D. laichartingella (Goeze, 1783), and D. taurica Zagulajev,
1986. Some authors have argued that Diplodoma adspersella may be a subspecies or even a form of D. laichartingella.
The revision of literature and the study of DNA barcoding fragments confirmed the inconsistency of D. adspersella as a
valid species, and therefore we propose the new synonymy of Diplodoma adspersella with D. laichartingella (syn. nov.).
During recent surveys in southern Italy, three specimens of Diplodoma were collected. DNA barcoding and morphological
analyses showed that COI sequences and male genitalia significantly differ from any previously studied specimen. As a
result, we described Diplodoma giulioregenii sp. nov., leaving unaltered the number of species belonging to this genus
known from Europe.
Key words: new species, biodiversity, Mediterranean forests, Naryciinae, Calabria
Introduction
Diplodoma Zeller, 1852 is a Eurasian genus belonging to the family Psychidae Boisduval, 1829 with eight species
described from temperate Europe to Far East (Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017). Three of these have been recorded in
Europe: Diplodoma taurica Zagulajev, 1986, which is endemic to the Crimean Peninsula, D. laichartingella (Goeze,
1783), which is widely distributed throughout Europe except for most Mediterranean islands, and D. adspersella
Heinmann, 1870, a less common species than the latter but recorded in several European countries (Arnscheid &
Weidlich, 2017). In Italy, Diplodoma laichartingella was recorded for Valle d’Aosta, Lombardy, Trentino-Alto
Adige, Veneto, Piedmont, and Friuli. The congeneric Diplodoma adspersella was recorded in central Italy (Emilia
Romagna and Abruzzo) and there is a doubtful record in Basilicata (Weidlich, 2015), where only one case was
observed (Bertaccini, 2013; Cassidy et al. 2021). However, neither species has certainly been recorded for the
South.
Diplodoma laichartingella and D. adspersella are extremely similar both from an ecological and behavioural
point of view, as well as in terms of larval development and morphological characters of the adults. The larvae
of both species feed on moss, lichens, and fungi and are often found on trunks, walls, and rocky cliffs. Forested
habitats (such as beech forests with an abundant layer of green algae and sparse soil vegetation) provide a favorable
habitat for Diplodoma laichartingella and other related species (Kunz, 1989). The larval cases of the two congeneric
species inhabiting central and western Europe exhibit a distinctly triangular section, consisting of two overlapping
cases covered by sand, soil, and particles of plant debris and dead small insects (Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017).
Both sexes exhibit fully developed wings, an archaic characteristic of the Diplodoma genus (Saigusa, 1962).
Accepted by B.-K. Byun: 19 Dec. 2024; published: 3 Feb. 2025
The differences between the two species lie in the dimensions of the larval case, which are larger in Diplodoma
adspersella, in the wingspan, which is 16–18 mm in D. adspersella and 10–15 mm in D. laichartingella, and in
the wing patterns, which are more contrasted and have forewing bands that are less interrupted in D. adspersella
(Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017). However, the lack of differences in the morphology of genitalia and wing pattern
variability has led some authors to hypothesize that Diplodoma adspersella could only be a subspecies or even a
form of D. laichartingella (Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017). Other authors have discussed a phylogenetic complex
“adspersella-laichartingella” (twin species) with at least three different clusters of Diplodoma laichartingella in
Europe, centred in South Germany, South-East Austria, and North Europe (Bertaccini, 2013).
Diplodoma taurica, endemic to the Crimean Peninsula, is the smallest species within the genus. The wingspan
of males ranges from 8 to 9.5 mm, while females have a wingspan of 9 mm. Its larvae inhabit the understory layer of
mesophilic forests and primarily feed on mosses, lichens, and withered herbs. The larval case is distinctly triangular
and elongated, tough, and covered with a soft layer of silk and plant debris, occasionally containing insect particles.
Diplodoma taurica can be differentiated from D. adspersella and D. laichartingella by the absence of an intercalary
cell on the forewings and its significantly smaller dimensions (Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017).
The study of Psychidae is quite difficult, primarily because it is difficult to collect adult specimens due to their
poor attraction to light (Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017). During several sampling campaigns conducted over the years
in southern Italy with the aim of investigating the lepidopteran biodiversity of forested habitat, three specimens
of this genus were unexpectedly collected. DNA barcoding revealed that the obtained sequences are significantly
different from any barcoded specimens present in available public repositories and belong to a new undescribed
species.
Material and methods
This paper is based on the study of 33 specimens, 32 of which belong to the genus Diplodoma and one to Narycia
duplicella (Goeze, 1783) as an outgroup (Tab. 1). Three specimens were collected by the authors and deposited
in the Lepidoptera research collection of the Wildlife Management and Forest Biodiversity Laboratory, Research
Centre for Forestry and Wood (CREA-FL). These specimens were collected using UV LED light traps (Infusino
et al., 2017), which were turned on before sunset and turned off after sunrise during nights with no or low wind,
temperatures near or above the seasonal mean, no or low precipitations, and near the new moon phase. The sampling
details of specimens are as follows:
—1 male: Vallone Argentino, Montalto Uffugo, 565 m a.s.l., 1.VI.2016, latitude 39.4082°N, longitude
16.1209°E, Castanea sativa Mill. woodlot;
—1 male: Vallone Tasso, Spezzano Sila (CS), 1376 m a.sl., 16.VII.2018, latitude 39.332393°N, longitude
16.418499°E, mixed forest of Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold subsp. calabrica (Delam. ex Loudon) and Fagus sylvatica
—1 male: Vallone Tasso, Spezzano Sila (CS), 1402 m a.s.l., 9.VII.2018, latitude 39.332823°N, longitude
16.414273°E, Fagus sylvatica forest.
Genitalia of one specimen were extracted and slide mounting following the main recommendations outlined by
Parenti (2000). The terminology of genitalia traits is according to Arnscheid and Weidlich (2017).
All our specimens were submitted to DNA barcoding analysing of the mitochondrial 5’ cytochrome oxidase gene,
subunit 1 (COI), following the standard procedures of the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding (CCDB). They were
successfully barcoded and automatically assigned to a Barcode Index Number (BIN) by The Barcode of Life Data
System (BOLD). Three sequences were obtained and compared with those available in BOLD (Ratnasingham &
Hebert, 2007) and GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/), using Simple Distance (p-dist) as a distance
model.
A phylogenetic tree was built using the Neighbor-Joining method (Saitou & Nei, 1987). The percentage of
replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) is shown next to
the branches (Felsenstein, 1985). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as the evolutionary
distances (Kimura 2-parameter, K2P) used to infer the phylogenetic tree (Kimura, 1980). All ambiguous positions
were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). The final dataset comprised a total of 682 positions.
Analyses were conducted using MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021).
372 · Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press
la CAVA et al.
Results
The sequences obtained for our specimens ranged from 653 to 679 bp in length and were assigned to the new
Barcode Index Number (BIN) BOLD:AFS5252. The nearest specimen available in BOLD (p-dist 6.45%) belongs
to D. Laichartingella. Its sequence is included in the BIN BOLD:AAF5091. This result, coupled with the results
of morphological comparison of male genitalia with available iconography (see below), and the critical revision of
literature, allowed us to revise the genus Diplodoma at the continental level describing a species new to science and
proposing a new synonymy.
Diplodoma giulioregenii La Cava & Scalercio, sp. nov.
(Figs. 1–19)
Type material. Holotype. [ITALIA] ♂, CALABRIA,—CC_C2, V.ne Argentino, Montalto Uff., 565 m—1.VI.2016,
39.4082°, 16.1209°, Scalercio & Infusino leg. [DNA barcode specimen ID LEP-SS-04527]. Paratypes. [ITALIA] 1♂,
CALABRIA SL_AF, Vallone Tasso, Spezzano Sila (CS), 1402 m—9.VII.2018, 39.332823°, 16.414273°, Scalercio
S. leg. [DNA barcode specimen ID LEP-SS-04552]; Gen. prep. CREA—0279, Stefano Scalercio; 1♂, ITALIA—
CALABRIA SL_AM, Vallone Tasso, Spezzano Sila (CS), 1376 m—16.VII.2018, 39.332393°, 16.418499°, Scalercio
S. leg. [DNA barcode specimen ID LEP-SS-04553], Gen. prep. CREA—0266, Stefano Scalercio.
Diagnosis. Male antenna composed by about 35 antennomers as in D. taurica, while in D. laichartingella is
composed by no more than 30 antennomers. Intercalary cell presents as in D. laichartingella, lacking in D. taurica.
In male genitalia (Figs. 5, 10) the length-to-width ratio (L-Wratio) of clasper is significantly higher in D. giulioregenii
(N=2; L-Wratio ranging from 1.8 to 2.5) than in available dissected males of D. laichartingella (N=9; L-Wratio min=0.7;
mean=1.0±0.2; max=1.3) (Figs. 11–17) and is similar to the picture of the original description of D. taurica (LWratio=1.9). Tendon 35 degrees angled upward at about half of its length in D. giulioregenii (Fig.18a), straight in D.
taurica, (Fig. 18b) and mild curved upward in D. laichartingella (Fig.18c). Despite the worn appearance of types,
D. giulioregenii does not seem to be significantly different from D. laichartingella in terms of wing pattern and
wingspan, whereas D. taurica is significantly smaller (Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017).
Descriptions
External characters (Figs. 1–4). Adult male, holotype (Fig. 1): wingspan 12 mm; colouration and vestiture: head (Fig.
2) covered in light-brown, shiny, short hairs on frons, with longer light-brown hairs posterior to antennal sockets;
labial palpi (Fig. 3, left side (a) and top view (b)) elongated and densely covered with long scales. Round compound
eye about 320µm heigh; distance between eyes about 450µm; a well-developed ocellus present immediately above.
The antenna (Fig. 4) thread-like, approximately half-length of the costa, composed by about 35–38 antennomers;
dorsally covered by scales and ventrally ciliated with cilia in average 115µm long. The thorax is covered with shiny
light-brown hairs. The forewings are elongated and darkish, with shiny light spots that are visible on coastal margin
and with shiny yellowish scales visible in the inner margin. Cloaking scales of forewings belong to IV class (Sauter,
1956). The fringe scales are short and compact, with shiny light spots. Venation with 10 veins from discal cell;
intercalary and accessory cells present. The hindwings are uniformly brownish, with a few shiny light spots on the
proximal margin of the wings. Venation with 6 veins from discal cell. The fringe scales are longer near the proximal
margin of the hindwings and shorter toward the distal margin.
Adult female. unknown.
Male genitalia (Figs. 5–9). Valva short and distinctly sclerotized, narrower distally with rounded apex, densely
covered with short hairs (Fig. 5). The tendon is short and angled upward by 35 degrees at half of its ventral length.
Sacculus long about two-thirds of valva length, roundish caudally with clasper narrower distally, distinctly pointed,
and sclerotized. Vinculum and tegumen fused. Pointed saccus 295µm long and 56µm wide at half of its length (Fig.
6). Slightly oval tegumen, distally with two hump shaped appendages (Fig. 7). Phallus 708µm long, thin slightly
curved and broader caudally (Fig. 8), bearing distally 4 tooths that become smaller proximally (Fig. 9).
Revisiting the genus Diplodoma Zeller, 1852 in Europe
Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press ·
Figure 1. Diplodoma giulioregenii sp. nov., male, 1.VI.2016, Montalto Uffugo, Cosenza, Italy (Coll. CREA), holotype.
FigureS 2–4. head (2); lateral (a) and upper view (b) of palpi; antenna (4), holotype.
Case. unknown.
Variation. we cannot observe variation in wings pattern because our specimens are worn due to the collecting
method. The only observable variation is in wingspan, which ranges between 12 mm and 13 mm (n=3) (Fig. 1, 19),
and in phallus length ranging 684 and 708µm in paratypes.
374 · Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press
la CAVA et al.
Genetic data. the maximum intra-BIN difference is 0.8% with the two paratype identical to each other. The
intra-BIN average distance is 0.54% (n=3). The distance from the nearest BIN (BOLD:AAF5091) is 6.25%, and
it is composed by European sequences of Diplodoma laichartingella. The p-distance from the Nearest Member
calculated by the BOLD Identification System is 6.76% for the holotype and 6.45% for the paratypes. The Nearest
Member is a specimen from Norway (Sample ID: NHMO-DAR-12513). In the neighbor-joining tree (Fig. 20)
resulting from the analyses of available DNA barcoding sequences belonging to the genus Diplodoma, eight distinct
BINs were present across the European continent and one in Far East Asia. Phylogenetic analysis showed that
the cluster of Diplodoma giulioregenii separates earlier than the branches containing D. laichartingella and D.
adspersella.
Diagnostic SNPs. we report the 679 bp long DNA barcoding sequence of the holotype compared with the
Diplodoma sequences utilised in this paper, with the 23 diagnostic SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism)
evidenced in bold:
TTTATATTTTATTTTAGGTATTTGATCGGGAATAATTGGAACATCTTTAAGATTATTAATTCGAGTAGAAT
TAGGGATTCCTAATTCATTTCTTGGAAGAGATCAAATTTATAATACTATTGTAACTGCTCATGCCCTTATT
ATAATTTTTTTTATAGTTATACCTATTATAATTGGGGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTACCTTTAATATTGGGG
GCCCCTGATATAGCTTTCCCTCGTATAAATAATATAAGATTTTGACTTCTTCCACCTTCTTTAATAATTTT
AATTATAAGAAGAATTGTAGAAAATGGAGCAGGAACAGGATGAACAATTTATCCTCCCCTTTCTTCTA
ATTTAACCCATTCAGGAAGTTCAGTTGATTTAGCAATTTTTTCTTTACATTTAGCAGGAATTTCATCTAT
TTTAGGGGCAGTAAATTTTATTACAACAATTATTAATATACGACCATTTAACATATCATTAGATCAAATAC
CCTTATTTGTATGGTCTGTGGCTATTACTGCAGTACTTTTACTTTTATCTTTACCAGTTTTAGCTGGAGC
AATTACTATGTTATTAACCGATCGAAATTTAAATACATCGTTTTTTGATCCTGCTGGAGGTGGAGACCCT
ATTTTATTCCAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGGTCACCCTGAAGTT.
FigureS 5–9. Diplodoma giulioregenii sp. nov., male genitalia, 9.VII.2018, Vallone Tasso, Spezzano Sila, Cosenza, Italy
(Coll. CREA), paratype, Gen. prep. CREA-0279. 5: Valvae; 6: Vinculum; 7: Tegumen; 8: Phallus; 9: Distal tip of phallus. Scale
bars of figures 5–8 equal to 200µm. Scale bar of figure 9 equal to 60µm.
Revisiting the genus Diplodoma Zeller, 1852 in Europe
Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press ·
Biology: unknown.
Distribution: endemic of South Italy, with type specimens collected from two different mountainous areas, the
Catena Costiera Paolana and the Sila Massif, at a distance of 27 km.
Habitat: all specimens were found in forested habitat, the holotype in a dense chestnut woodlot and the paratypes
in a pure beech forest and in a mixed beech-Calabrian black pine forest.
Derivatio nominis: in memory of a young Italian researcher murdered by all the evil in the world, waiting for
the truth for Giulio Regeni.
FigureS 10–17. Comparison of claspers belonging to Diplodoma giulioregenii sp. nov. (10) and the available dissected
European specimens of Diplodoma laichartingella (11–17). 10: D. giulioregenii sp. nov., Italy (Gen. prep. CREA—0266);
11: D. laichartingella, Wales (Psychidae : Diplodoma laichartingella—mothdissection.co.uk); 12: Austria (Diplodoma
laichartingella—LepiWiki); 13: Sweden (http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/d/diplodoma_laichartingella.html); 14:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)); 16: England (Psychidae : Diplodoma laichartingella—mothdissection.co.uk);
17: England (Psychidae : Diplodoma laichartingella—mothdissection.co.uk)
376 · Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press
la CAVA et al.
Figure 18. Comparison of valvae of Diplodoma giulioregenii sp. nov. (a), D. taurica (b), and D. laichartingella (c). The
arrow points to the diagnostic difference observed in the tendon shape.
Revisiting the genus Diplodoma Zeller, 1852 in Europe
Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press ·
Figure 19. Diplodoma giulioregenii sp. nov., paratypes, 9.VII.2018 (a), 16.VII.2018 (b) Vallone Tasso, Spezzano Sila,
Cosenza, Italy.
Diplodoma adspersella Heinemann, 1870 syn. nov.
DNA barcoding analyses we carried out, highlighted a high COI diversification of Diplodoma laichartingella and
D. adspersella without a clear separation between them. In the Neighbour-Joining tree of European Diplodoma
(Fig. 20), D. adspersella and D. laichartingella present in BOLD and identified by the authors on the basis of
morphology, are not coherently separated by barcoding. One Slovenian specimen, that refers to a larva and its
case, was morphologically identified as D. adspersella and included in a BIN (BOLD:AAP9669) together with
Slovenian and Austrian D. laichartingella specimens identified using wing pattern. In other two cases the name
D. adspersella has been attributed by wing patterns to all the specimens composing the BINs, but these BINs are
intermixed with those of D. laichartingella, making a mtDNA-based differentiation of these taxa unlikely. In light
378 · Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press
la CAVA et al.
of our genetic analyses, that further weaken the validity of D. adspersella questioned by several authors due to the
lack of morphological differences, we propose Diplodoma adspersella Heinemann, 1870 as a junior synonym of
Diplodoma laichartingella (Goeze, 1783).
Figure 20. Neighbour-joining tree derived from sequences of Diplodoma specimens available in BOLD. Scale bar indicates
a phylogenetic distance of 0.02 nucleotide substitutions per site. Numbers on the branches indicate bootstrap percentage after
500 replications in constructing the tree.
Discussion and Conclusions
The changes we carried out in the genus Diplodoma of western Europe do not affect the number of species known
for this geographic area due to the description of Diplodoma giulioregenii sp. nov. and the new synonymy of
Diplodoma adspersella with D. laichartingella.
Usually, the specimens of Diplodoma were collected as larvae and reared to the adult stage, as they are rarely
attracted to the lights commonly used for moth sampling. The specimens of the type series of D. giulioregenii have
been collected using UV LED light traps, likely thanks to their low intensity (Infusino et al. 2017). It is known that
high-intensity light sources are not attractive for several species (Infusino et al. 2017), especially for Psychidae
(Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017). Therefore, the use of different kinds of light sources can help to better survey local
biodiversity. However, to describe the still unknown preimaginal stages of this new species and to obtain adults
with a well-preserved wing pattern (i.e., in a better condition than the type series), field surveys looking for larval
cases are needed. The discovery of new species in forested habitats of southern Italy is increasing during the last
decade (Scalercio et al. 2016; Infusino et al. 2018; Govi et al. 2022), fostering the role of this geographic area as a
biodiversity hotspot.
In the future, some records could be attributed to D. giulioregenii or to other new Diplodoma species. In fact,
the taxonomy of one specimen tentatively attributed to D. adspersella from Samos, Greece (Arnscheid & Weidlich,
2017), and one case tentatively attributed to D. laichartingella from Basilicata, South Italy (Weidlich, 2015), must
be ascertained.
Kozhanchikov (1956) hypothesized that Diplodoma adspersella could be a form of D. laichartingella. However,
he never proposed a synonymy, as was stated by Sobczyk (2011) and Arnscheid & Weidlich (2017), between the
Revisiting the genus Diplodoma Zeller, 1852 in Europe
Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press ·
two species, merely stating that he lacked sufficient material to confirm this hypothesis. The taxonomic status of D.
adspersella remained unclear until recent years, as some authors stated that it could potentially be a subspecies or a
form of D. laichartingella (Arnscheid & Weidlich, 2017). Nowadays, the availability of molecular data has allowed
us to clarify that D. adspersella is a junior synonym of D. laichartingella. Further support for this conclusion
could be provided by morphological analysis of the genitalia of the specimens belonging to all the observed BINs.
However, available iconography concerning the morphology of genitalia attributed to D. laichartingella covers all
the western European range of the species (Fig. 10–17), showing no appreciable differences between provenances.
Table 1. For each barcoded specimen of Diplodoma available in BOLD, we provide the following information: sample
ID, sequence ID, taxonomy, country, region or site (when available), BIN, and sequence length (bp).
Sample ID
Sequence ID
Taxonomy
Country
Region/Site
Sequence
length (bp)
LEP-SS-04553
BCLEP398923
Diplodoma
giulioregenii
Italy
Calabria
BOLD:
AFS5252
LEP-SS-04552
BCLEP398823
Diplodoma
giulioregenii
Italy
Calabria
BOLD:
AFS5253
LEP-SS-04527
BCLEP396323
Diplodoma
giulioregenii
Italy
Calabria
BOLD:
AFS5254
BC TS Psy 0067
PSYCH067-11
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Switzerland
BOLD:
ABA9351
STG805
TIPSY896-19
Diplodoma adspersella
Slovenia
Koroska
BOLD:
AAP9669
TLMF Lep
24356
LEAST998-17
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Austria
Osttirol
BOLD:
AAP9669
CLV1723
GRSLO203-10
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Austria
Osttirol
BOLD:
AAP9669
STG227
TIPSY701-15
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Slovenia
BOLD:
AAP9669
NHMO-DAR12513
LON5850-17
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Norway
Luster
BOLD:
AAF5091
MM10121
LEFIE867-10
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Finland
Ostrobottnia
ouluensis
BOLD:
AAF5091
BC TS Psy 0068
PSYCH068-11
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Germany
Saxony
BOLD:
AAF5091
MM13096
LEFIF822-10
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Finland
Karelia borealis
BOLD:
AAF5091
MM05826
LEFIA109710
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Finland
Satakunta
BOLD:
AAF5091
clv16
TPSY016-08
Diplodoma
laichartingella
United
Kingdom
England
BOLD:
AAF5091
MM08640
LEFIE292-10
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Finland
Alandia
BOLD:
AAF5091
MM20606
LEEUA547-11
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Latvia
BOLD:
AAF5091
BC ZSM Lep
53307
GWOSU05611
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Germany
Saxony
BOLD:
AAF5091
MM05707
LEFID095-10
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Finland
Karelia borealis
BOLD:
AAF5091
……continued on the next page
380 · Zootaxa 5583 (2) © 2025 Magnolia Press
la CAVA et al.
Table 1. (Continued)
Sample ID
Sequence ID
Taxonomy
Country
Region/Site
Sequence
length (bp)
NorBOL
LepVM204
LEPVM20413
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Norway
Oppland
BOLD:
AAF5091
RRNW_029_C8
RRNW177523
Diplodoma
laichartingella
United
Kingdom
BOLD:
AAF5091
RRNW_040_C4
RRNW292823
Diplodoma
laichartingella
United
Kingdom
BOLD:
AAF5091
RRNW_042_E6
RRNW316923
Diplodoma
laichartingella
United
Kingdom
BOLD:
AAF5091
clv16.1
TIPSY017-08
Diplodoma
laichartingella
United
Kingdom
England
BOLD:
AAF5091
BC ZSM Lep
106925
GWOUC18419
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Italy
Piedmont
BOLD:
AAF5091
TLMF Lep
18870
LEATJ101015
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Austria
Nordtyrol
BOLD:
ABX7941
BC ZSM Lep
64281
FBLMZ20012
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Germany
Bavaria
BOLD:
ABX7941
STG762
TPSY853-19
Diplodoma
laichartingella
Slovenia
Stajerska
BOLD:
ADZ1838
BC ZSM Lep
105307
GWOTS94119
Diplodoma adspersella
Italy
Abruzzo
BOLD:
ADZ0541
BC ZSM Lep
73488
GWOTL109013
Diplodoma adspersella
Italy
Emilia Romagna
BOLD:
ACJ6281
BC ZSM Lep
103774
GWOTX26318
Diplodoma adspersella
Italy
Emilia Romagna
BOLD:
ACJ6281
BC ZSM Lep
73498
GWOTL110013
Diplodoma adspersella
Italy
Emilia Romagna
BOLD:
ACJ6281
BIOUG15869C09
GMRSF08414
Diplodoma
Russia
Primorskiy Kray
BOLD:
ACP8787
Acknowledgments