(AGENPARL) – Cambridge (England), lun 11 febbraio 2019
11 February 2019
A lack of available domestically produced nuclear fuel and delays in constructing and commissioning nuclear power plants, including first-of-a-kind plants and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR), meant that India failed to meet its nuclear generation targets under the governmental plans over the decade to 2017.
PFBR nuclear island and turbine buildings (Image: Bhavini)
India’s nuclear generation target under its 11th five-year plan, covering the period , was 163,395 million units (MUs) and the 12th five-year Plan () was 241,748 MUs, Minister of state for the Department of Atomic Energy and the Prime Minister’s Office Jitendra Singh told parliament on 6 February. Actual nuclear generation in those periods was 109,642 MUs and 183,488 MUs respectively, Singh said in a written answer to questions in the Lok Sabah.
Singh attributed the shortfall in generation was to lower generation operating from due to a lack of availability of the necessary quantities of domestically produced fuel during the three years before ; delays to the commissioning of two 1000 MWe nuclear power plants at Kudankulam due to local protests and legal challenges; and delays in the completion of two indigenously designed pressurised heavy water reactors and the PFBR.
Kudankulam 1 and 2 are VVER-1000 pressurised water reactors (PWRs) supplied by Russia’s Atomstroyexport under a Russian-financed contract. The units were built by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) and were commissioned and are operated by NPCIL under IAEA safeguards, with supervision from Russian specialists. Construction of the units – the first PWRs to enter operation in India – began in 2002.
Singh said local protests resulted in the halt of commissioning work at Kudankulam for nine months from September 2011 to March 2012, when he said project commissioning had been at its peak. As a consequence, additional time was needed to remobilise the workforce and contractors, he said. Litigation by anti-nuclear groups, and compliance with supreme court directives, impacted commissioning in 2013, he said. Unit 1 entered commercial operation in December 2014 and unit 2 in April 2017.
Delays in the manufacture and supply by domestic industry of critical equipment for first-of-a-kind 700 MWe pressurised heavy water reactors – Kakrapar units 3 and 4, and Rajasthan units 7 and 8 – has led to delays in the completion of those units, the minister said, as well as noting the delay in completion of the PFBR, which is being built at Kalpakkam by Bhavini. In answer to a separate question, Singh said the PFBR is in an “advance stage of integrated commissioning” and is “expected to approach first criticality by the year 2020.”
Eight of India’s operating nuclear power plants are not under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards and can therefore only use indigenously-sourced uranium. The other 14 units operate under IAEA safeguards and can use imported uranium. The Indian government has taken several measures to secure fuel supplies for reactors in operation and under construction, concluding fuel supply contracts with several countries for existing and future reactors under IAEA Safeguards and by “augmentation” of fuel supplies from domestic sources, Singh said.
Kakrapar 3 and 4 and Rajasthan 7 and 8 are all currently expected to enter service in 2022, according to World Nuclear Association information.
Joint venture discussions
In February 2016 the government amended the Atomic Energy Act to allow NPCIL to form joint venture companies with other public sector undertakings (PSUs) for involvement in nuclear power generation and possibly other aspects of the fuel cycle. In answer to another question, Singh confirmed that NPCIL has entered into joint ventures with NTPC Limited (National Thermal Power Corporation, India’s largest power company) and Indian Oil Corporation Limited. Two joint venture companies – Anushakti Vidhyut Nigam Limited and NPCIL-Indian Oil Nuclear Energy Corporation Limited – have been incorporated, and discussions on possible projects to be set up by the joint venture companies are in progress.
An exploratory discussion had also been held with Oil & Natural Gas Corporation, Singh said. Indian Railways – which has in the past been identified as a potential joint venture partner for NPCIL – had “conveyed that they were not contemplating entering into an MoU for setting up of nuclear power plants,” Singh said.
Researched and written by World Nuclear News